Wednesday, October 31, 2012

In Praise of Weakness

 Author's Note:

I realized after writing this that it may be cryptic for some. For those struggling with one of the themes, please consider this: to neglect, hate, or ridicule someone or something for weakness or simplicity is an error on your part. These are all strong words, to be sure, but I've heard far too many arguments along the lines of "he's a sinner how could you love him?" Even of the blessed St. Peter "he was a fool and serves as an example for us." Others may say "I hate myself because I keep messing up [in sin, etc.]." Others still have said that "the Church is just human authority filled with human weakness, I follow God alone."

Part of this is about patience and perseverance coupled with understanding and a willingness to change.

I ask, humbly, you reflect on those sentiments with this. This is hardly adequate for full but in the interest of your own attention and retention I cut this down significantly.
What are you talking about??  (Comment below if you feel that way)

I. Introduction

Those who do not share in the weaknesses of the body have no share in the body itself. For what body in this life is free from corruption and limitedness? Even the great Body of Christ is subject to weakness precisely because he subjected Himself to our weakness since “he took the form of a slave” (Phil 2:7) and “was of human estate.” Even after the Resurrection His resplendent and transformed body still bore the wounds of his glorious crucifixion (cf. Jn 20:20). It should be noted even more that Jesus identifies Himself with the weak and broken for “what you have done for the least of these you have done for me” (Mt:25:40). Likewise Jesus identified Himself with those who were persecuted, ridiculed, and killed in His name. This is why He said “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?” (cf. Acts 9:4, 5).

Paul said that “Christ is the head of the body the church.” (Col 1:18). We have seen, albeit briefly, that Christ shared in our humanity fully and willfully. We saw, through His resurrection, that He transformed our weaknesses while still keeping the physical marks of that weakness. They were not cast aside or hidden but present in plain sight. Jesus told Thomas “put your finger in my hands and in my side” (cf. Jn 20:27ff). The history of Christianity is a constant call to “place our fingers on the wounds of His body.” Thomas doubted the Resurrection, perhaps, because after witnessing the horror and shame of the cross (and living in his own shame) he asked ‘how might anything good come from this?’ Christ showed him precisely the good that came from it, namely His own person.
Caravaggio's famous painting not only represents the doubt of Thomas but that same doubt that we feel about our Church and her divine characteristics. Are we willing to address our doubts? Are we still willing to trust in the Church?

II. Sharing in Weakness

This is what I call each of you to do today: If you are to truly share in the Body of Christ do you share in its weaknesses? The weaknesses I refer to are failures in charity, excessive opulence, elements of the Inquisition and Crusades, sex abuses, and every weakness that we see in our own person. Blaming the past, however horrible—and indeed some things are horrible—is to separate fallen and weak humanity from the life of faith. Faith is not perfection but, in a manner of speaking, seeking perfection. Weakness is either self-generated or encountered, shall we shy away from either?

I rarely see this type of image, of Jesus as a fragile child being cared for. Jesus Christ, our savior and Lord, became as a little child out of love for us.
Christ met our broken humanity. He calls us through faith and baptism to share in His mission of transforming all of humanity. If we deny the humanity of the Body we separate ourselves from that Body. The Church is the Body of Christ beset by human weakness but all the same transformed by Christ and upheld by the Spirit.

When we recognize weaknesses and failures there is a twofold response: the first is active insofar as we seek to rid ourselves of that weakness (whatever it may be). The second, equally important, is to realize that we are not separate from our weaknesses. The weaknesses that we carry inform our actions for the future, even in healing. If we do not address our weakness actively we won’t change effectively. If we try to disassociate ourselves from our weaknesses we become insensitive to the weaknesses of others and we forget who we are.

III. Examples of Weakness Transformed

St. Peter is our first example and our guide. He was filled with faith and he was blessed personally by Christ (cf. Mt 16:16-20). But he had his faults too. He was rash and at times overzealous. This zeal, coupled with his predispositions about what the Messiah was supposed to be, led him to deny Christ three times while He was being humiliated. He abandoned his friend and the one whom he loved. “He wept bitterly” (cf. Mt 27:75). After the resurrection Christ called out to him and Peter responded. Christ confronted Peter’s sin, fear, and weakness not by shaming him but by asking him, “Peter, do you love me?” Jesus asked him this three times for every time Peter denied him. Peter recanted three times saying “You know that I love you” (Jn 21:17). Peter is a man whose strengths and weaknesses are on full display. Just as God had chosen Moses, Abraham, and David before He chose this time to call a simple fisherman to greatness. These patriarchs and this king themselves sinned, doubted, and failed. Through it all they carried out what God had asked of them. Only Peter, however, was given “the keys of the kingdom of heaven” (Mt 16:19).
Despite his brashness and weakness Christ still pulled him from the water. Despite his denial Jesus came to him and Peter grew in understanding, wisdom, and love because of Christ's example.
Our chief example, and one that has given me pause for years, is the Eucharist. I believe in Christ and I believe in Christ risen. I also believe that at the Last Supper he gave us a model to follow: he took the bread, broke it and said, 'take this all of you and eat this. This is my body which has been given up for you.' He also said of the wine 'this is my blood.' This I believe with my whole heart. This sentiment is in accord with all that has been said above. Truly, to our senses it appears as mere bread and mere wine. Then I recall with wonder that “he emptied himself … coming in human likeness and found in human appearance” (Phil 2:7). Likewise that “he had to become like his brothers in every way” (Heb 2:17).

Indeed, the Eucharist is regarded as the Son of Man, present sacramentally in ordinary bread and wine which has been transformed by the prayer that Christ entrusted to His Apostles and their successors. The Eucharist is both a glorification of the Cross and a sacrifice that dips into the eternal moment of Christ's one sacrifice and shares fully in it. It is something that stands outside of time. Something so grand, God Himself! in ordinary, daily food. Christians have praised the extraordinary in the ordinary as well as paradox from the beginning insofar as “Jews look for signs and Greeks look for wisdom but we proclaim Christ crucified” (1 Cor 1:22-23).
This is what we exalt. Do you?

Furthermore Jesus Christ Himself is “the living bread that came down from heaven that one may eat it and not die. I AM the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world” (Jn 6:50-51). I could occupy an encyclopedia set with the richness of these verses. The word “eat” (phagein) has no spiritual connotation. It literally means to chew and physically eat. By eating this living bread we shall not die. Then Christ follows by saying “ego eimi” which means “I am.” But this is no mere “I am” but rather a direct reference to God speaking about Himself in the Old Testament. It is a proclamation of authority and power—this is something we should listen to. He said “I AM the living bread come down from heaven.” He then says “Whoever eats/chews this bread will live forever.” He further says “the bread which I give is my flesh,” Literally my earthly flesh. The simple bread which He gives is his flesh. For the time being let this entirely inadequate account suffice. No “ego eimi” statement in Scripture is a metaphor or an opinion. It is Jesus speaking in the authority of the Father on an intrinsic reality.

IV. Share in Weakness, Share in Glory

What is my purpose in saying all of this? Proceeding from the Eucharist and the example of the Apostles (chief among them Peter) Christ gave us two simple and lowly things and transformed them. He transformed bread and wine into His flesh and blood. He transformed simple fishermen into philosophers, teachers, and bearers of His message. Though they were of human estate they were transformed and “filled with the Holy Spirit” (Acts 2:4).

The Church is the Body of Christ—it is subject to weakness. The Eucharist is bread and wine made the Body and Blood of Christ—it is common and ordinary yet mysterious and sublime. The Apostles were chosen by Christ Himself to bear unique witness to His teaching and mission—they were “also human beings” (Acts 10:26). Jesus Christ identifies with the poor, persecuted, and the oppressed in an intimate way—they are lowly and 'worthless' in the eyes of the world. Finally, Jesus Christ Himself, was born of a virgin in poverty. He was a helpless child and a man subjected to ridicule and cruel torture. A man who took on our every weakness.

By eating His flesh and blood, and through baptism, we join ourselves more fully to Him so that we may share in His suffering. In our own flesh we “fill up what is lacking in the afflictions of Christ on behalf of His body, which is the Church” (Col 1:24). When the Church, or even her members, do evil the whole suffers. By our personal and communal work, love, and suffering we correct the wounds of that Body and also “share in our master's joy” (cf. Mt 25:14-23).
Follow their hands and their eyes. They are looking at Christ, yes. They are looking at the Eucharist.
Join yourself, then, more fully to Him and His Church, for those who do not share in the weaknesses of the Body will separate themselves from the Body. In rejecting weakness and wickedness as unlovable they move away from the God “who so loved the world that He gave His only Son” (Jn 3:16a).

5 comments:

  1. Nicely written and expressed! I loved especially the references to Peter and others mentioned in Scripture who were transformed from being weak to full of the Holy Spirit.

    While reading, I was thinking of possible target audiences of this post in general and was wondering why you think some Catholics (I understand people of other or no faiths can fall into this too but I'm primarily interested in this population) are so quick to demean the weak. I'm picturing the ones who give generously at offerings yet scowl at those who show signs of having chosen or been given a different path (e.g. pregnant teen, recovering addict, homeless man). This reaction is usually unintentional: they don't know they're judging so critically. Further, how can one go about addressing that "holier than thou" mentality?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you very much. You also bring up a great topic of discussion which I hope I address adequately:

      It's hard to label why Catholics, as a 'population,' might demean the weak. I guess it's hard to see in what manner you see this happening or why you feel it's excessively widespread. You do say that for some (even many) that it seems unintentional, so let's see what might be an unintentional cause.

      -Some Catholics, perhaps, work very hard on moral perfection. They seriously want to better themselves, overcome weaknesses, etc. That habituation might lead them to dislike/detest/avoid those whom they perceive as not being of the same mindset.

      -Some Catholics may feel that they are in possession of moral truth or superiority simply by the name Catholic. It almost has a flavor of Donatism [http://carm.org/donatism], itself a half-unintentional heresy if you ask me. Those who live a Catholic life by their standards might begin to believe that others are 'defaming the name of Catholic.'

      -It may be the case that those who are a single, teen mother, a recovering addict, etc. are perceived as those who would not listen to 'correction.' This of course raises the question for me why these people think the others are even at mass if they weren't looking for Christ. 'Correction' is a hard topic, however, because you say it yourself: sometimes a bad situation is brought about by choice and other times circumstances. That sensitivity is necessary from the start.



      I suppose I could go on but I don't want to flood the topic.

      As for the last question, addressing a holier-than-thou mentality. I think one of the hardest absurdities of the phrase is that some will accuse others of being "holier than thou" while themselves making up reasons to criticize others.

      The number one remedy is humility, but easier said than done. The measure that we are unwilling to be corrected by the well-meaning and ill-meaning alike is the measure of our humility or perceived 'holiness.'

      The holier than thou mentality is hard to address because this sentiment is often associated with my first example (moral rigor). Taking an accusing tone with anyone will work very poorly. Sometimes the best first step is probing their own feelings as to why their upset.

      In my honest opinion, whenever I struggle with how to respond to others or accept this or that critique I often look to the book of Proverbs and Wisdom in Scripture. That often sets me straight!

      Thanks again for your comment. If I was unclear about anything please let me know!

      Delete
    2. Thank you for your comprehensive reply! I understand that the question I posed was sort of difficult to answer: from reading your response, it's very clear how this topic varies from person to person and it's impossible to know exactly where one stands in both his own weakness and his perception of others'. I can also see a lot of psychology falling into this... how one's perceived weaknesses shown in another can make that person unlikable, since he stands as a reminder of what still needs to be accomplished.

      Perhaps, since I am still only being exposed to Catholicism and only recently regularly attend mass, that I am very sensitive to how others at church look at me. I confess that I likely take certain glances and phrases too personally and am quick to become defensive (though, respectfully, I don't speak this aloud during conversation). As an "outsider," it can be an isolating feeling trying to become a part of a community, and it's both the Church and my responsibility to make this transition easier and more welcoming.

      How do you see that we as humans can best reconcile the struggle between putting on a good face (being successful person in all areas: family, work, intelligence, culture, religion, etc.) and admitting our limitations? When is the appropriate time to expose this side to other Catholics, because isn't it only then that you can truly respect and accept where one stands in utilizing our weaknesses to become closer to God?

      I'll definitely try your strategy in using Proverbs and Wisdom when encountering similar situations. Thanks again for taking the time to not only write your blog but to respond to my questions!! I really value your work and opinions.

      Delete
    3. It's my pleasure, really.

      What I think is important to take away from my response above (and your reading of it too) is that we all need to stick in our minds our brothers and sisters. We are all a collection of joys, anxieties, expectations, etc. and all of us are interacting with one another. Indeed, the Church is a hospital for souls and a home for all people.

      It's a matter, sometimes, of being sensitive that we are a public person and we have a public faith that isn't (or shouldn't be) radically distinct from our private person. I've come to learn--rightly I think--that we are all ambassadors for Christ in all our actions. Some people do this poorly because, perhaps, they simply do not realize the weight of their actions. I could go into it more but I don't want to write an essay and muddy things beyond that.

      I don't know how much weight to put into psychology, at least at this point. It's easy to speculate that this or that reason is why someone doesn't like us or is uneasy around us. Sometimes it's complex and other times simple. In my mind, it's best not to occupy too much time on these thoughts. It may very well be a component but then we may also start to see things in other people that aren't there and then we become a victim of what we see in other people.

      ==

      I think it's great you're looking into Catholicism. What has interested you about it? -if you don't mind speaking on it.

      ==

      It's also tough, I imagine, coming in from the outside and perhaps being out of sync with everything. It's all a process, however, and we learn in baby steps at times. Have you ever spoken to the pastor (or another priest) there and introduced yourself? Sometimes it's hard to welcome someone who they don't know needs to be welcomed. This is, as you say, also an effort that the Church needs to do a bit more.

      I hope, however, that your feelings of isolation pass and the community welcomes you. I'm not sure, but perhaps introducing yourself to some of the groups at the parish may be a good start. In that sense maybe the pastor would be a good help in directing you in that manner.

      ==

      The only way I can think of reconciling 'putting on a good face' and 'admitting our limitations' is how we deal with those limitations. Are we patient when attacked, gentle when others fall or screw up, and are we honest (yet gentle) when we talk to others about it?

      We will falter, that much is true. I think if we look at our successes as the mark of our virtue then we begin to work only for good results. This means that we value the trophy over the race so to speak.

      But to answer your question more specifically, that is "when is it appropriate to expose this other side?"

      I think in a more intimate and trusting situation. I think it would be hard to just come up to someone and tell them your weaknesses because they don't know you quite well. I think building up a relationship naturally brings about the good and the bad.

      It's not just about exposing weaknesses, but it's also about looking at your talents, good traits, and strengths and magnifying them in God as well.

      Our weaknesses and strengths both draw us closer to God. Both can lead us to gratitude in that our weaknesses teach us humility and our strengths can be used to uplift others who struggle.

      One example would be someone who is very good at reading Scripture and understanding it helps teach another. But this same person struggles with humility. The person who learns from him is very humble and by way of his example teaches humility to the other. Our weaknesses make room, in a sense, for each others strengths to lift us up.


      I hope this helps a bit more. Please, if you have more questions or if I was vague, let me know. I personally find these books helpful but perhaps in your own way you will find a book (such as Psalms, the prophets, the Gospels, etc.) that speak to you in a better way.

      Thank you so much again!

      Delete
  2. Hello everyone, i'm Linda Harry from United State i was diagnosed with Parkinson Disease  for over 6 years which made me loose my job and my relationship with my Fiance after he discovered that i was having Parkinson, he departed from me, and i tried all my best to make him stays, but he neglected me until a friend of mine  from UK told me Great healer, who will restore my life back with his powerful healing herbal medicine. then he  sent me his email address to contact him- drimolaherbalmademedicine@gmail.com. and i quickly contacted him, and he said my condition can be solved, that he will treat the disease immediately only if i can accept trust on him and accept his terms and condition, i Agreed because i was so much in need of help by all means, so i did all he instructed me to do. And surprisingly after two weeks, He sent me a text, that i should hurry up to the hospital for a checkup, which i truly did, i confirm from my doctor that i am now ( PARKINSON NEGATIVE) my eyes filled with tears and joy, crying heavily because truly the disease deprived me of many things from my life, This is a Miracle, dr imoloa also uses his powerful herbal medicine to cure the following diseases:  lupus disease,  mouth ulcer,  mouth cancer, body pain, fever, hepatitis A.B.C.,   syphilis,  diarrhea,  HIV/AIDS,  Huntington's Disease,   back acne,  Chronic renal failure,   addison disease,  Chronic Pain,   Crohn's Disease,   Cystic Fibrosis,  Fibromyalgia,   Inflammatory Bowel Disease,  fungal nail disease, Lyme Disease, Celia disease, Lymphoma, Major Depression,  Malignant Melanoma,   Mania,  Melorheostosis,   Meniere's Disease,  Mucopolysaccharidosis , Multiple Sclerosis,  Muscular Dystrophy,  Rheumatoid Arthritis, Alzheimer's Disease, parkison disease, vaginal cancer, epilepsy,  Anxiety Disorders, Autoimmune Disease,   Back Pain,  Back Sprain,   Bipolar Disorder,  Brain Tumour,  Malignant,   Bruxism, Bulimia,  Cervical Disk Disease, cardiovascular disease, Neoplasms, chronic respiratory disease,  mental and behavioural disorder,     Cystic Fibrosis,   Hypertension, Diabetes, asthma,  Inflammatory autoimmune-mediated arthritis.  chronic kidney disease, inflammatory joint disease,  impotence,  feta alcohol spectrum,  Dysthymic Disorder,   Eczema, tuberculosis,  Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, constipation, inflammatory bowel disease, bone cancer, lung cancer. contact him on email- drimolaherbalmademedicine@gmail.com. and also on whatssap- +2347081986098

    ReplyDelete