I've gotten into some pretty rough
conversations over the past week. What often happens is that I'll receive comments from
people who like my articles. They'll say things like "this is nice" or 'well put' and so on. I agree and disagree with my personal friends on a number
of things and we still have many-houred conversations which remain amiable—so don't be afraid
to talk with me or disagree with me. It's actually much more pleasant to speak with
others on topics where we act as friends as opposed to rivals.
Now, I won't complain about these
others who disagree with me. That's the acquired taste of the
philosopher, namely being told you're wrong. In another sense, that's
the acquired joy of a Catholic and all Christians. Scripture seems to
indicate this as well:
"The man of intelligence fixes his
gaze on wisdom, but the eyes of a fool are on the ends of the earth"
(Prv 17:24).
Now to the average ignorant Christian
or the average ignorant non-Christian this may seem like a 'pay
attention to God and those who don't are just fools.'
Well, in one
sense, maybe it is so. Don't be a fool, then, and follow with me here:
perhaps we need to see that wisdom is a gift. In Scriptures it is not
often the powerful or the strong who are wise, rather it is the poor
and the humble. So how could the simple-minded be wise and thus
'intelligent'?
Simply this: that the wise realize that
wisdom is a gift, which is to say that we're given wisdom. Aquinas
likened wisdom to a hill upon which a man can see all that happens
below. I might add that wisdom is thanking God for the gift of hills
that afford us such a sight--if you're still following me.
So what are the ends of the earth that
make us fools sometimes? I find that Chesterton put it well: “There
is nothing which is so weak for working purposes as this enormous
importance attached to immediate victory. There is nothing that fails
like success” (GK Chesterton, Heretics). It may
also be said that “lust indulged starves the soul, but fools hate
to turn from evil” (Prv 13:19) means that when we desire something
very temporary and hollow (such as a victory) we starve our souls and
do not feed it with what is a most beautiful nourishment—reason.
Yet we, like fools, when confronted or attacked feel that crushing
our opponent will result in some sort of nourishment, but it's hardly
the case.
Technically this meme is still popular but past its peak, so I'm still behind the times. |
Perhaps this is why Augustine said
“hate the sin but not the sinner.” In many ways we must conquer
ignorance, ignorance to sin, and sin for they are 'lackings' as it
were in an otherwise good person.
Now, does this mean that we should shrink from the truth when we've found it? Or even run from difficulty when confronted? No, the former becomes timidity and the latter cowardice. Conviction is not arrogance, but they are cousins. I recall reading in Étienne Gilson saying, though I can't find where exactly, that 'When we are confronted with the truth we are also confronted with a moral problem, that is whether or not I will accept and incorporate this truth.' Naturally, a great number of us don't agree on what 'truth is' and thus we hand the reins to the men who are philosophers--who are seemingly madmen.The problem sometimes is that many people think they're philosophers.
I have to laugh, though, when I'm
confronted by those who say things like “Ah yes.... I would like to
spar with you if I might.” Or “Let us see if Christianity is
true” when their intentions are at times an attempt to strip
credibility from anyone who could possible believe in Catholicism or
Christianity. (We can see this in the recent conversion of Leah
Libresco (http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unequallyyoked/,
see comments).
But I do not fault them for doing this
because this is how I am many times and certainly how I was when I
was younger. I can attest first-hand the great power that
perfectionism held over me and the years upon years it burrowed under
my skin. I didn't have any major breakdowns, but I was prone to
stress because I was also someone who wanted to do 25 different
things—but perfectly. When you lust after perfection in whatever it is you want you're often left the fool. Luckily, and by His grace, people came into
my life and were more patient with me than I ever could have been (we
find that our weaknesses can be grounds for us to be both broken
down, but rebuilt as compassionate to these same weaknesses we find
in others).
Similarly, I do not fault them because
often times these are well-meaning, well-educated individuals worth
talking with and taking seriously. It forces me to stretch my
intellectual muscles and consider propositions that aren't necessarily problems (or hang-ups) for me but are for others. Not only is this attitude necessary for
apologetics, it's necessary for Christians. Or did Christ not feel the
full weight, death, and terror of suffering, sin, and death because
he loved us? So too, we should take on the apprehensions, anxieties,
and difficulties of our fair interlocutors out of love for them.
Aquinas contemplating the greatest gift and receiving the greatest wisdom, that is the say the Logos. |
That's what I try to do. Sadly I can't
say I always succeed, but young men like myself are moved by passion
when attacked. Passion is in no way bad but it's a tool that must be
used properly.
We all perhaps need to reflect on the
matter that philosophy is properly called a love of wisdom because
wisdom is something worth loving and not always something we really
deserve, but get anyway.
Truly wisdom literature is a gift that
keeps giving. I let this last quote be my prayer and my conclusion:
Wisdom 8:17-21
- Thinking thus within myself, and reflecting in my heart That there is immortality in kinship with Wisdom, and good pleasure in her friendship, and unfailing riches in the works of her hands, And that in frequenting her society there is prudence, and fair renown in sharing her discourses, I went about seeking to take her for my own. Now, I was a well-favored child, and I came by a noble nature; or rather, being noble, I attained an unsullied body. And knowing that I could not otherwise possess her except God gave it-- and this, too, was prudence, to know whose is the gift-- I went to the LORD and besought him ...
Great lesson. Love the combination of catechesis and philosophy.
ReplyDeleteLH