Perhaps instead of us thinking of the Church as being cheap, stupid, or boring we should look at the intentionality behind the act. The host being “bland” is symbolic. See that the bread is, for us, a sort of deprivation. It is not special, it does not have an exceptional flavor, and with respect to other foods it is bland. But this is exactly the comment that the Church wants to make about Christ: that he became flesh like us. In comparison to the divine our flesh is cheap, and fallible, and bland. This does not mean that that our flesh is “bad” just as this normal bread is not “bad.” Christ, however, by his graciousness took on our weak and fallen humanity to raise it up. We proclaim through our very bread that humanity is simple and lacking, but not bad—in fact the body may be used for holy work and sacred things.
The bread that we receive is not merely a symbol, but it is a symbol given to us for our benefit—it is meant by means of earthly concerns to direct our mind to heavenly truths. Christ adopted our humanity so that God might adopt us. He “took the form of a slave” (Philippians 2:7) which is to say he was unassuming, common, and everyday. Even the people at the synagogue doubted his power when they asked “Isn’t he the son of Joseph?” (cf. Mt 13:55, Jn 6:42) In his common estate, however, Jesus expressed the power of the Spirit by virtue of his obedience to the Father.
God, incarnate in common humanity, confounded those who would never believe that the body could be redeemed or divinized. To those who believe, however, the bread we have stands as a powerful comfort to us who are still pilgrims.
More powerfully, Christ left us the Eucharist so we might partake of him for our whole lives. The Body of the Sacrifice was resurrected so that we might make continual sacrifice to the Father and that it might be one sacrifice all the same. This is because the Body we offer to the Father is His own, and the Body we offer can never be destroyed or pass away. For “when he became perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him” (Heb 5:9). “Jesus took bread, said the blessing, broke it, and giving it to his disciples said, “Take and eat; this is my body” (Mt 26:26). He did likewise with the cup, saying it was his blood.
The early Church herself attests to this reality. When Irenaeus wrote Against Heresies (circa 182 AD) the Eucharist was an important mark of the true Church:
The Church offers with single-mindedness, her gift is justly reckoned a pure sacrifice with God. ...[and we truly offer the first fruits of creation, that which is most loved] ... how can they [the heretics] say that [our] flesh, which is nourished with the body of the Lord and with His blood, goes to corruption, and does not partake of life? ... Our opinion is in accordance with the Eucharist, and the Eucharist in turn establishes our opinion. For we offer Him His own, announcing consistently the fellowship and union of the flesh and Spirit. For as the bread, which is produced from the earth, when it receives the invocation of God, is no longer common bread, but the Eucharist, consisting of two realities, earthly and heavenly. (Book IV.18.iv-v)
Irenaeus of Lyon didn't treat it as if it were simple bread. |
Recognize our savior in the breaking of the bread in new ways. Reflect not only on the spiritual truths, but what the physical experience of it all relates to us. |
"In his common estate, however, Jesus expressed the power of the Spirit by virtue of his obedience to the Father."
ReplyDeleteand
"Yes, not even Scripture revealed this to them, but the bread."
We're taught to be obedient to the will of the Father. Jesus' command to "Take and eat", being obeyed, then releases the Spirit into our hearts and souls. Are we at that moment intertwined with the divinity of Jesus? How weak then is our flesh! We need to constantly feed on the Word of God.
Thank you for explaining the symbolism so well!
ReplyDeleteI'd like to think about the experience itself as well and hear your thoughts. There is something about the primitivism of using the less intellectual thus less human senses like touch, taste, and smell. Adding to that the very nature of digestion and how our bodies take and use what we ingest to feed cells, a percentage of which make up our body and blood. How encompassing the Eucharist is, combining what we know to be Jesus' words with an intimate experience like eating.
On a side note, has the bread used for the Eucharist always been bland? Another, more practically speaking, reason for the uninteresting flavor may stem from the fact that anything else would be a distraction or may open opportunities for an unpleasant experience: it just tastes bad to some people.
Sarah, sorry for taking so long to reply. With finals and coming back home to move into a parish, it's been tough to sit down and respond.
ReplyDeleteI think the "primitism" can sometimes get a bad connotation by people, but I've always found that I learn best through images and stories. In the same way, I think we remember some things when they engage all our senses, like a good meal for example. The memories we have with friends are enhanced by the sense-data we attach to them.
The Eucharist being digested is also an image of the Church who, when she receives Christ, distributes it among her members.
Another image that came to mind was how blood is oxygenized through the heart and lungs. The living Church is the tissue and blood cells, and all that. In order for the blood to receive oxygen it must return to the heart. Upon returning to the heart it gets the 'food' for the rest of the body. I'm rambling, but it makes sense to me!
I think the bread has been typically bland. Even in the early Church there were provisions not to mix honey or much in the bread because it was meant to continue the Passover bread and customs.
I think the blandness also speaks of universality--without any taste whatsoever it allows itself to be equally accessible to all (not offensive to anyone).
I was just thinking about the Incarnation as well, and how since you have Oscar, I'm sure it's a huge joy despite the sleepless hours of sacrifice. Whenever I look at my cousins children I think of them, of course, but also how Jesus was just the same. I think when Scripture says "you put on the lips of children praise" and "He has revealed these things to children."
For me, children are the number 1 proof of God in the world--they teach us our frailty, power, love, and worth all at the same time. I hope in time you have 2 or 3 more Oscars--they're truly a blessing.
Thanks again, Sarah!